theFarWilds.com
http://thefarwilds.com/forum/

Regarding Originality
http://thefarwilds.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1580
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Huger [ Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Regarding Originality

This is in regards to the Originality thread, but it's new because I'd like to try a new spin on it. First, I think there are far more deck possibilities in FW than in most TCG. To help prove this I'd simply like people to list decks they have run recently that are competitive (use your own definition, but to me this does not mean it wins the EC every time, more like in most games you have at least 40% chance of winning).

To get us started here are three decks I know are viable:

1) Sylvan one domain rush
2) CI one domain rush
3) Chaos one domain rush

Author:  Keyser [ Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Regarding Originality

My most recent decks that I've used that don't fall in the above categories and that have won or made finals in ECs are:

1) Elemental/Chaos/Greck Egg
1) Celador themed (Beacon of, Knight of )
2) three domain Dark Legion


I've even managed to beat Themist with one of them! lol

Author:  Keyser [ Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Regarding Originality

Whenever 2 Bellfry's fall into my hands, I want to try a Vampire themed deck.

Author:  Zurken [ Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Regarding Originality

Vampires aren't that strong, believe me.. but I am about to do exactly the same, Keyser :D

7) CI 3 domains with Trade Routes and stuff like Paladin of Xosa (Illithid)
8) CI + ele in any combination (me, Far)
9) MF + ele (Vapor, Fort) many variations on well known and hated combo :) (WrathOfGods, Themist)
10) MF rush (emancipate is a specialist on this one, question him)
11) MF + CI tought creatures - my speciality, but I don't play it much tho. It needs to draw Ord Stones to work
12) CI Psions deck - Exalted One is a real killer! (but this one is pretty hard to do, Themist I think have one good)
13) Altren's MF + ele, deadly one especially in his hands
14) pure ele - Melds (yaron) of course, mea culpa!

...well I think it's enough for now :) sorry if I've messed names, or forgotten to list someone
oh..
15) sylvan + Chaos (Vessel of Cathil) - grug. I really really hate that one

Author:  yaron [ Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Regarding Originality

Decks I've had some success with:

Sylvan Rush in two flavours: 1 domain and 2 domain.
MF/SL/MF 3-domain (CaveTroll's MF/SL/SL seems better, though)
3-Domain Desert/Meld (Zurken, I hope you meant "pure ele", not "poor ele" :-))

I'm also messing with an MF-EL "Blind the Stones" deck, which has the pedigree of being the deck that backfires in the most hilarious ways, but is otherwise not very effective.

Author:  Altren [ Fri Jan 15, 2010 8:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Regarding Originality

16) pure elementals with Erg Geysered mud mogis, meld, tough guys and buoyancy.
Won half EC's played with it. Well, with blazing desert (№14) this rate is much higher.

Author:  Keyser [ Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Regarding Originality

Altren wrote:
Well, with blazing desert (№14) this rate is much higher.


What is blazing desert (№14) ?

Author:  Altren [ Fri Jan 15, 2010 6:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Regarding Originality

Dust devils, flame ents and desert :)

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/