They are a serious pain, but in the end, I don't think they are overpowerful. What I hate is when they attack a battleready unit, it's insta-kill either way. Battleready units are the elites, they should know better that to fight back like that
| theFarWilds.com http://thefarwilds.com/forum/ | |
| Leprous shambles http://thefarwilds.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=259 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | RedFlag [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Leprous shambles |
Are about one point too tough. Either downgrade the instant destroy ability, make ranged units more common, or take a point off their toughness |
|
| Author: | MistStlkr [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Leprous shambles |
They are a serious pain, but in the end, I don't think they are overpowerful. What I hate is when they attack a battleready unit, it's insta-kill either way. Battleready units are the elites, they should know better that to fight back like that
|
|
| Author: | RedFlag [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Leprous shambles |
I think that a permanent -1 HP marker on a meleeing unit would be better than an insta kill |
|
| Author: | MistStlkr [ Tue Nov 11, 2008 2:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Leprous shambles |
Or take that a step further and have it act like a poison doing 1pt each turn after the melee cumulative with each melee if you attack it again? In the end, the attacker still dies but it lends some credence to the idea that something with higher HP should be able to survive a bit longer. |
|
| Author: | VeratilEladamri [ Tue Nov 11, 2008 7:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Leprous shambles |
I have to agree that Leprous' ability is quite powerful. For a 1d3f card that kills anything that touches it... |
|
| Author: | Kremik [ Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Leprous shambles |
Well, it depends. If you have Flamekin or HellCats, you don't care. If all you have are HomeGuards, then you lose two cards to one. If you have the right cards, the Leprous Shamble si no problem. If you don't, it can be naughty. Still, with its speed, its low damage and so on, it can be most often avoided long enough to be dealt with appropriately. |
|
| Author: | RedFlag [ Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Leprous shambles |
If there were more ranged units that were common it'd be less of an issue. As it is, most of the common ranged units are in sylvan decks. You telling me a dwarf can't learn how to throw a rock? |
|
| Author: | VeratilEladamri [ Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Leprous shambles |
RedFlag wrote: You telling me a dwarf can't learn how to throw a rock? Or shoot a gun? |
|
| Author: | Kremik [ Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Leprous shambles |
Yup. We want dwarf machinegun teams and dwarves with sniper rifles. |
|
| Author: | RedFlag [ Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Leprous shambles |
VeratilEladamri wrote: RedFlag wrote: You telling me a dwarf can't learn how to throw a rock? Or shoot a gun? Well, the blunderbuss teams aren't all that helpful because they don't seem to show up very often. And they're like a 2 domain card, right? Shambles would be out there potentially from round 1 tearing shit up. Create a card called Pitfall Trap and let it act like an entangle but for mountainfolk and without terrain restrictions |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ | |