Fixed in next update.

thanks for looking at this and such a quick response. I followed the link and see that the fourth condition applies to cases 1-3. why is this condition present? in my experience, it makes 3+ domain decks much less playable ... which makes me sad.

it also makes mahal a much more powerful card. I can imagine single domain decks of every domain that would benefit from the addition of one (or two) mahals. do we really want to encourage exploiting autodraw in this way?

I just played two games in which autodraw kept giving me quorum stones and vessel of cathil as a second source of domain. All of my creatures were two domain or higher, so I couldn't actually get the domain from these sources. I ended up having to use defection to steal an opponent's dude, which was easy because i had about 20 flux at this point =P, and then put vessel on it. I suck and probably would've lost anyway, but it was fairly frustrating.

@krakhoar. If you are using only 1 warren and then quorom stones and vessels, then you must expect this and have plenty of 1 domain creatures in deck.Because all you will autodraw after first round is quorom and vessel...

"4) If you don't have a domain providing card in hand that you have the domain to play, you will draw the first domain providing card in your deck."

I am still trying to understand why this condition is present. as I noted above, it encourages building spam decks and discourages tri-domain decks.

Agreed. This should be removed, because once you have around 3-4 domains, you have to occupy a hand slot with a domain provider just to get the crappy draw off your back.

I agree with this, it has been bugging me for a while.
Why autodraw a domain card you don't need?

We should only be autodrawing cards when we need them. For example, if we need a domain, we autodraw a domain provider of the appropriate card(s).

I'm fine with everything else at the moment though.