Here's the main one: Fissure

Honestly, who cares if he has to last 10 or 12 rounds (14, 16..) against opponent who has no buildings, so no creatures etc..? And supported by few Negates and Volcanos MF can get anyone in such a situation quite easily.
I think those cards should not take your Glory down, but your enemie's Glory up.. that would really balance them immediately.
Thoughts?

That's a clever remark and I would definitely vote for such a change. Not that I consider MF unbeatable (nor fissure a particularly unbalanced card) but IF one wants to penalise fissure-users with glory than let's make it a real disadvantage, as it is it really matters in very few situations.

I'm going to agree with this one wholeheartedly.

It should never cost you your own glory. I don't care if I lose glory, since I can get it back.

It should make opponent's glory go up. That really would balance the cards that use glory as a price.... well not that those cards are unbalanced, just the concept of glory payment is, I think.

I like this idea or make it so they have to have 4 glory to cast it right now. Obviously them having to get 4 glory is less of a drawback but right now it is such a good card so I am fine with anything that weakens it slightly.

I like the idea. That would be really a good change but giving 4 glory to the enemy would be too much, it should be 2 points of glory to the enemy for it to be balanced (I think).