| theFarWilds.com http://thefarwilds.com/forum/ | |
| tales of yore http://thefarwilds.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=308 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | jargon [ Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | tales of yore |
sooo unbalanced there should be like a "pay X and remove from game with lifecycle 3" so you don't just have to get two glory and wait it out... |
|
| Author: | jed [ Sun Nov 23, 2008 1:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tales of yore |
yeah it needs to be changed. Still thinking about the best way to do it. |
|
| Author: | jargon [ Tue Nov 25, 2008 5:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tales of yore |
jed wrote: yeah it needs to be changed. Still thinking about the best way to do it. or you could just make some cards/creatures with "disenchant target world enchantment" |
|
| Author: | MistStlkr [ Tue Nov 25, 2008 5:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tales of yore |
I've never used it, but I've had it used as a last-round boost against me, so I may be thinking of it wrong, but here is my take. If you can "get two glory and wait it out" and win that way, without taking another action the rest of the game, then the other player was so completely stifled I don't think Tales really mattered... it just accelerated the inevitable. If you can sit there for at least 9 rounds and not even have to move a piece, was the opponent even a threat? Was there the slightest chance they would win without having Tales on your side? Just my two cents. |
|
| Author: | ivandubina [ Tue Nov 25, 2008 6:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tales of yore |
Problem is that... well,let's imagine next situation: You got 4 glory, your opponent got 0. You cast teh tales. If he has no disenchants/alternate glory sources, then outcome of game is pretty much clear. Yeah, surely, you need upper hand to benefit from it, and something like half decks have their responses. But still, it's very powerful. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ | |