Should be entangle-able, no?

"Enchant non-Aloft Creature." Why should it enchant buildings. There's many cards in game that works only with creatures or buildings.

It just seems that by definition the building now has legs... they should be vulnerable to being entangled. Just seems like in it should then be treated like a non-aloft non-living creature at that point.

Keep in mind that change would also make it vulnerable to other cards that are creature only... like Sunburst, Charm, Possession... etc. etc.

I don't want someone possessing my building, moving it with planar void, and sacrificing it to an alter of ix lolz.

I guess so. It was just a little surprised when it didn't work. The other ones don't make much sense, presumably the legs are artificial so things like posession wouldn't work anyway.. it just seemed odd though I understand that with the mechanics of the game it is the way it is. I just thought I'd put it out there for discussion.

Ever seen the movie Howl's Moving Castle? This card gives a building legs like that

Not offhand, no. I always pictured the building sprouting some some Dali-esque legs and walking off.