theFarWilds.com http://thefarwilds.com/forum/ | |
Legs of Baba Yaga http://thefarwilds.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=517 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | MistStlkr [ Fri Jan 09, 2009 8:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Legs of Baba Yaga |
Should be entangle-able, no? |
Author: | Altren [ Fri Jan 09, 2009 9:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Legs of Baba Yaga |
"Enchant non-Aloft Creature." Why should it enchant buildings. There's many cards in game that works only with creatures or buildings. |
Author: | MistStlkr [ Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Legs of Baba Yaga |
It just seems that by definition the building now has legs... they should be vulnerable to being entangled. Just seems like in it should then be treated like a non-aloft non-living creature at that point. |
Author: | Sunyaku [ Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Legs of Baba Yaga |
Keep in mind that change would also make it vulnerable to other cards that are creature only... like Sunburst, Charm, Possession... etc. etc. I don't want someone possessing my building, moving it with planar void, and sacrificing it to an alter of ix lolz. |
Author: | MistStlkr [ Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Legs of Baba Yaga |
I guess so. It was just a little surprised when it didn't work. The other ones don't make much sense, presumably the legs are artificial so things like posession wouldn't work anyway.. it just seemed odd though I understand that with the mechanics of the game it is the way it is. I just thought I'd put it out there for discussion. |
Author: | Sunyaku [ Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Legs of Baba Yaga |
Ever seen the movie Howl's Moving Castle? This card gives a building legs like that |
Author: | MistStlkr [ Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Legs of Baba Yaga |
Not offhand, no. I always pictured the building sprouting some some Dali-esque legs and walking off. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |