| Author |
Message |
|
cylone
|
Post subject: Multi-domain (aka "gold") cards  Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:53 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 3:00 pm
Posts: 124
|
|
well i was just wandering whats the general opinion on such cards.
And i mean cards with costs such as [Both Sylvan/Dwarf] in domain, as well as its opposite [sylvan OR dwarf] domain.
Is there a place for these in TFW, perhaps as "chase" rares/odds? (ie. one for each combination)
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
mindstheatre
|
Post subject: Re: Multi-domain (aka "gold") cards Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:41 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 4:29 pm
Posts: 254
|
|
I remember Jed saying somewhere in some forum post that multi-domain had always been on the table. I know I, Zyco, and a few of the others that come with card ideas have posted a few possibilities.
That being said, I'm not positive the next set is the time to release them.
_________________
-Minds
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Haothehare
|
Post subject: Re: Multi-domain (aka "gold") cards Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:21 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 5:00 pm
Posts: 38
|
|
this is very interesting.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Agroagro
|
Post subject: Re: Multi-domain (aka "gold") cards Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:34 am |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 2:56 am
Posts: 51
|
|
Ive heard rumors of new domains. If thats so I dont think they need to explore "gold cards until theyve settled on the main domains.
Gold cards in my opinion should draw allegiances between factions and encourage deck types. Never a bad idea really.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Wicked
|
Post subject: Re: Multi-domain (aka "gold") cards Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:56 am |
|
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 12:17 pm
Posts: 98
|
Same issue was brought up back in the testing...
There were actually multi domain buildings then, but it seems like they didn't make the final cut. ~Wicked~
|
|
| |
|
|
|
