I don't have a problem with Faxos calling me out in the lobby or in this thread. I tend to be a real jackass when I lose - I was acting like a putz, and it was shitty of me to threaten to stall.

Just so you know though, Faxos, I went out to have a cig, realized what a silly jerk I was being, and came back in and resigned because I felt stupid. Only then did I see your post in the main thread. My apologies for poor sportsmanship. Trash talk (like what insidus is always QQing about) is one thing, but that was abuse of the game system and I was wrong to do it.

I had an idea related to this thread...

So the other day I had two games start almost simultaneously, but since I had a bunch of tabs open as it was, I didn't notice the second game as I began concentrating on the first. My opponent made no attempt to notify me that the game had started, and I didn't notice until they had multiple wells and 10 glory.

I think there should be an "honor" element to the game. Basically, if someone does something shitty, you can give them a "dishonor" vote, or if they do something nice, they get an "honor" vote. Since people are generally more likely to be negative than positive with stuff like this, I'm thinking an "honor" vote would give you +3 points, and "dishonor" would give you -1. If your cumulative honor score was below zero, there would be subtle consequences. For example, maybe people with a negative score couldn't receive byes in tournaments... or any other little obscure thing we can think of.

And maybe if your honor score is high enough, there are benefits too... although I can't think of anything at the moment. To control this, each player could only make one honor or one dishonor vote per some time period...

Anyone else have any ideas? I'm sort of rambling at this point...