Login    Forum    Search    FAQ

Board index » Game Talk




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Regarding Originality
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:36 am
Posts: 39
This is in regards to the Originality thread, but it's new because I'd like to try a new spin on it. First, I think there are far more deck possibilities in FW than in most TCG. To help prove this I'd simply like people to list decks they have run recently that are competitive (use your own definition, but to me this does not mean it wins the EC every time, more like in most games you have at least 40% chance of winning).

To get us started here are three decks I know are viable:

1) Sylvan one domain rush
2) CI one domain rush
3) Chaos one domain rush


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Regarding Originality
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:41 pm 
Offline
The Dark Platypus
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:48 am
Posts: 951
My most recent decks that I've used that don't fall in the above categories and that have won or made finals in ECs are:

1) Elemental/Chaos/Greck Egg
1) Celador themed (Beacon of, Knight of )
2) three domain Dark Legion


I've even managed to beat Themist with one of them! lol

_________________
Altren wrote:
I agree with Keyser, and that's what I'm planning to implement actually.

|| The Rise of the DCC | Plasmatium Netherious | Tastes Like Chicken | The Astridian Conspiracy ||

Guild -> | Platypus Rising|


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Regarding Originality
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:47 pm 
Offline
The Dark Platypus
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:48 am
Posts: 951
Whenever 2 Bellfry's fall into my hands, I want to try a Vampire themed deck.

_________________
Altren wrote:
I agree with Keyser, and that's what I'm planning to implement actually.

|| The Rise of the DCC | Plasmatium Netherious | Tastes Like Chicken | The Astridian Conspiracy ||

Guild -> | Platypus Rising|


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Regarding Originality
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:01 pm
Posts: 526
Vampires aren't that strong, believe me.. but I am about to do exactly the same, Keyser :D

7) CI 3 domains with Trade Routes and stuff like Paladin of Xosa (Illithid)
8) CI + ele in any combination (me, Far)
9) MF + ele (Vapor, Fort) many variations on well known and hated combo :) (WrathOfGods, Themist)
10) MF rush (emancipate is a specialist on this one, question him)
11) MF + CI tought creatures - my speciality, but I don't play it much tho. It needs to draw Ord Stones to work
12) CI Psions deck - Exalted One is a real killer! (but this one is pretty hard to do, Themist I think have one good)
13) Altren's MF + ele, deadly one especially in his hands
14) pure ele - Melds (yaron) of course, mea culpa!

...well I think it's enough for now :) sorry if I've messed names, or forgotten to list someone
oh..
15) sylvan + Chaos (Vessel of Cathil) - grug. I really really hate that one


Last edited by Zurken on Sat Jan 16, 2010 5:57 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Regarding Originality
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:47 am
Posts: 150
Decks I've had some success with:

Sylvan Rush in two flavours: 1 domain and 2 domain.
MF/SL/MF 3-domain (CaveTroll's MF/SL/SL seems better, though)
3-Domain Desert/Meld (Zurken, I hope you meant "pure ele", not "poor ele" :-))

I'm also messing with an MF-EL "Blind the Stones" deck, which has the pedigree of being the deck that backfires in the most hilarious ways, but is otherwise not very effective.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Regarding Originality
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 8:59 am 
Offline
Lead Developer
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 9:55 pm
Posts: 716
Location: Moscow, Russia
16) pure elementals with Erg Geysered mud mogis, meld, tough guys and buoyancy.
Won half EC's played with it. Well, with blazing desert (№14) this rate is much higher.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Regarding Originality
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:28 pm 
Offline
The Dark Platypus
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:48 am
Posts: 951
Altren wrote:
Well, with blazing desert (№14) this rate is much higher.


What is blazing desert (№14) ?

_________________
Altren wrote:
I agree with Keyser, and that's what I'm planning to implement actually.

|| The Rise of the DCC | Plasmatium Netherious | Tastes Like Chicken | The Astridian Conspiracy ||

Guild -> | Platypus Rising|


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Regarding Originality
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 6:34 pm 
Offline
Lead Developer
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 9:55 pm
Posts: 716
Location: Moscow, Russia
Dust devils, flame ents and desert :)


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

Board index » Game Talk


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: