Author |
Message |
Keyser
|
Post subject: Re: CI Overpowered Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 5:11 pm |
|
|
The Dark Platypus |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:48 am Posts: 951
|
Zblader wrote: IMHO, here are the hardest things to deal with in CI. 1. Course of Destiny 2. AMS 3. Creatures that give benefits upon destruction/creation, especially with AMS.
4. Revenant Bishop. Zblader wrote: Trade Routes isn't that hard to deal with. If you know TR is coming, you can use to help you as well, so I agree with this point. Zblader wrote: Ever heard of Restore's Nature's Balance? I thought so at first. I put it in a deck to counter CI's TR and Course of Destiny. It didn't do much good in practice, thought. Zblader wrote: Renevant Bishop can be easily turned against an enemy player with good use of Charm or Possesion, and it can get in the way of drawing important cards sometimes. How can Charm help? It costs 6 flux and 3 domain, gains a creature for... ONE TURN...and then your opponent Rev B's it. Zblader wrote: I'd like to note that CI is somewhat dependent on more skilled/expierienced players due to lack of 1-domain creatures. Newer players might not fare so well, and then it's a cake walk because of all those enemy gaining benefits. And there is always a deck that is stronger than another deck. What lack of 1 domain creatures are you talking about? A viable deck is single CI domain Rune of the Swift Rush.
|
|
|
|
|
Zblader
|
Post subject: Re: CI Overpowered Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 5:01 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:10 am Posts: 829
|
Keyser wrote: How can Charm help? It costs 6 flux and 3 domain, gains a creature for... ONE TURN...and then your opponent Rev B's it.
Charm and Possesion will send Bishop back to your deck. And considering Bishop normally runs around with Trade Routes, you can pretty much limit your opponent's domain while saving a Trade Route to keep the Bishop on the field. Keyser wrote: What lack of 1 domain creatures are you talking about? A viable deck is single CI domain Rune of the Swift Rush. Crap, I forgot about that since i haven't played in a while using CI. Forget about it.
|
|
|
|
|
Keyser
|
Post subject: Re: CI Overpowered Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:24 pm |
|
|
The Dark Platypus |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:48 am Posts: 951
|
Yes, Bishop goes back to the top of their deck, but a Charm seems to be a huge waste to make that happen, especially because you know they get to use the Bishop NEXT turn to kill the Charm
|
|
|
|
|
Zblader
|
Post subject: Re: CI Overpowered Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 3:08 am |
|
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:10 am Posts: 829
|
Keyser wrote: Yes, Bishop goes back to the top of their deck, but a Charm seems to be a huge waste to make that happen, especially because you know they get to use the Bishop NEXT turn to kill the Charm Dude, Charm's an enchant. Bishop would then go back to the Charmer's deck, thus destroying Charm but allowing the Charmer to draw Bishop next turn and depriving the opponent of a Bishop. Charm may a bit costly compared to possesion, but it's still a good benefit.
|
|
|
|
|
Keyser
|
Post subject: Re: CI Overpowered Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:59 pm |
|
|
The Dark Platypus |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:48 am Posts: 951
|
Zblader wrote: Keyser wrote: Yes, Bishop goes back to the top of their deck, but a Charm seems to be a huge waste to make that happen, especially because you know they get to use the Bishop NEXT turn to kill the Charm Dude, Charm's an enchant. Bishop would then go back to the Charmer's deck, thus destroying Charm but allowing the Charmer to draw Bishop next turn and depriving the opponent of a Bishop. Charm may a bit costly compared to possesion, but it's still a good benefit. Bishop doesn't go into the Charmer's deck, it goes back to it's owner's deck. That's why it is OP.
|
|
|
|
|
Zblader
|
Post subject: Re: CI Overpowered Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:22 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:10 am Posts: 829
|
Keyser wrote: Zblader wrote: Keyser wrote: Yes, Bishop goes back to the top of their deck, but a Charm seems to be a huge waste to make that happen, especially because you know they get to use the Bishop NEXT turn to kill the Charm Dude, Charm's an enchant. Bishop would then go back to the Charmer's deck, thus destroying Charm but allowing the Charmer to draw Bishop next turn and depriving the opponent of a Bishop. Charm may a bit costly compared to possesion, but it's still a good benefit. Bishop doesn't go into the Charmer's deck, it goes back to it's owner's deck. That's why it is OP. Oh, I thought using Charm would cause Bishop to switch to your control. Nevermind.
|
|
|
|
|
Altren
|
Post subject: Re: CI Overpowered Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:32 pm |
|
|
Lead Developer |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 9:55 pm Posts: 716 Location: Moscow, Russia
|
Charm and Possesion (used on Bishop) will send Bishop back to your deck. Both change controller of bishop first and only the it is removed. Similar effect with Mass Confusion or Psychotic Break - Bishop goes to Hell.
|
|
|
|
|
Zblader
|
Post subject: Re: CI Overpowered Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 1:25 am |
|
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:10 am Posts: 829
|
Altren wrote: Charm and Possesion (used on Bishop) will send Bishop back to your deck. Both change controller of bishop first and only the it is removed. Similar effect with Mass Confusion or Psychotic Break - Bishop goes to Hell. Thank you Alt for clearing this whole discussion up. But hey, I never knew Hell was the neutral player's hand. Where's Heaven? All jokes aside, this goes to show that Bishop is OP, but at least it's stealable.
|
|
|
|
|
Monyx
|
Post subject: Re: CI Overpowered Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 5:49 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 12:11 pm Posts: 148
|
seems zblader already said it 3 times and altren once but for those who are having trouble understanding....POsseSSion And CHArM send bishop to top of your deck rather than caster of bishops deck. because for a split second before the after affect occurs the bishop is under ur control sending it to ur deck rather than the opponents.
_________________
|
|
|
|
|
Zblader
|
Post subject: Re: CI Overpowered Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:16 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:10 am Posts: 829
|
Monyx wrote: seems zblader already said it 3 times and altren once but for those who are having trouble understanding....POsseSSion And CHArM send bishop to top of your deck rather than caster of bishops deck. because for a split second before the after affect occurs the bishop is under ur control sending it to ur deck rather than the opponents. And that should be the last time it needs to be said. (in this thread at least)
|
|
|
|
|
|