| Author |
Message |
|
Keyser
|
Post subject: Fissure didn't remove a Training  Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:54 am |
|
 |
| The Dark Platypus |
 |
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:48 am
Posts: 951
|
|
I thought I was playing a great move-- I cast "fissure" one a space to remove "training" from a "sleet mogi" so it would die at end of turn (would have 0 health without the training).
However, fissure didn't remove training.
Is this the way it is supposed to work? Is an enchantment on a flier considered "aloft"? Or is this a bug?
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
Ugly_Pug
|
Post subject: Re: Fissure didn't remove a Training Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 2:35 am |
|
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:50 pm
Posts: 132
|
|
Training is an Enchant Creature. I would say you need to remove the creature to remove the enchantment, unless using something like Disenchant which specifically targets an enchantment. If creature is aloft, then I suppose the enchantment is too. I don't think it is a bug.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kash
|
Post subject: Re: Fissure didn't remove a Training Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 4:14 am |
|
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 12:08 am
Posts: 173
|
|
My understanding is that enchantments are only considered a figure on the space if they are space enchantments. Otherwise they are part of whatever they are on, so this is working as intended. That said, I always forget the aloft part and fissure mogis anyways.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Keyser
|
Post subject: Re: Fissure didn't remove a Training Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:05 am |
|
|
| The Dark Platypus |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:48 am
Posts: 951
|
|
Fissure says "All Non Aloft Entities"
The hover text defines Entities as : Creature, Building, Enchantment, Corpse, Ruin
|
|
| |
|
|
|
headshot
|
Post subject: Re: Fissure didn't remove a Training Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:47 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:12 am
Posts: 270
|
Training is an entity. If it doesn't have aloft, it should be removed by fissuring that space, right? If how it works was intended, enchantments on aloft figures need to get the text "aloft", like creatures enchanted by boyancy do for example. Then again there are MANY much more important things for Jed and Altren to work on at the moment. 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kash
|
Post subject: Re: Fissure didn't remove a Training Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 3:31 am |
|
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 12:08 am
Posts: 173
|
Keyser wrote: Fissure says "All Non Aloft Entities"
The hover text defines Entities as : Creature, Building, Enchantment, Corpse, Ruin Right, but you only quoted the first part. "All Non Aloft Entities on target Space" Training is not a space enchantment, so it is not on the space. It is instead on a creature that is on the space, so it goes with the creature.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Keyser
|
Post subject: Re: Fissure didn't remove a Training Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 7:26 am |
|
|
| The Dark Platypus |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:48 am
Posts: 951
|
|
I assumed that everything ON a space was, in fact, ON that space...
To me, the wording "on" means anything within the 6 equidistant connected lines that form the outline of that hex.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
